Friday, October 21, 2005

The father of East Brunswick 10K

After twenty years of participating in the East Brunswick 10K as both a runner and volunteer (usually both) I finally got to meet the person whose name has been on so many of those long sleeve shirts. This year the legendary New Brunswick track coach John Ragone was an honorary starter of both the 5k and 10k to lend a historic footnote to the races he helped start.

I was hoping Mr. Ragone wasn’t too disappointed at the small turnouts for the two races and that he realizes the challenges of attracting runners to fall races that aren’t marathons or marathon tune-ups. More and more the running choices tend to be either very long or very short. The 10k’s, which used to be so easy to find, are slowly being blanched from the race calendar, replaced by the easier to manage and run 5k.

I still have vivid memories of my first EB 10K from 1986 and one of the best was when the full race results came in the mail about two weeks later. It was sent courtesy of the race director, George Kelly, who was also a software developer. This was a decade before Compuscore and its ilk and was certainly ground breaking at the time. Up to then the only races that ever sent results were the very large ones like Asbury Park. I still have this priceless record of the ninth annual race and it speaks volumes about the quality of racing in that time period. I barely made the front page, 95th out of 463 in 39:39! The ageless one, Roger Price, then 37 was a mere 21st in 34:29, a time exceeded by only two runners this year. Over 1/3 of the finishers were under seven minutes a mile on a course that was very similar to this year’s.

Our own Dave Hoch finished sixth in 32:57 and John Kane was 44th in 36:36 but many of those top finishers have long since left the running scene, making Roger all the more remarkable for twenty plus years of consistency.

Did it mean that runners were better than they are today? The answer seems obvious and the reason could be that there were more good runners who were in their early period of racing, while today many of the runners like myself have long ago run their best race and out there for fitness. Running a pedestrian 49:14 left me sore for several days, a depressing thought but still better than most 49 year olds. I ran as well as I could and had an enjoyable and competitive finish with three other runners, two of whom I beat. The clock time left me accomplishing my modest goal of breaking 50 and it wasn’t my worst time at this race.

East Brunswick was also ahead of its time as one of the few races giving out long sleeve shirts. I’m pretty certain they’ve given out long sleeve shirts every year since, many of which are in my regular rotation of shirts.

East Brunswick 2005 was as well organized a race as I’ve run this year, with a goody bag that was the envy of all other races, chock full of usable items. The course continues to be a perfect combination of rustic roads with some challenging hills and inviting straight-aways that lend themselves to fast times for those fit enough.

While the race in many ways is not what it once was, it had a nice increase in 10k finishers this year and I am certain there was nary a person unhappy with the fabulous amenities. With the new energetic leadership of Catherine Glamkowski, I think this race is in good hands for many years to come, something that should leave Mr. Ragone with a
nice feeling as we near our fourth decade. Long live the 10K!

Friday, October 22, 2004

Running and Baseball

This column was originally written in October 2004.

And on the sixth day I slept. and slept and slept some more. Thankfully the series ended because I couldn’t take much more. It was like running five marathons in five days but my legs weren’t sore just my eyes. Because of a rainout Friday night the Yankees and Red Sox played five straight days of riveting baseball games that ran the whole gamut of emotions. I won’t reveal which side I was rooting for but like most of the Eastern Seaboard I was entranced by what transpired in the best rivalry in sports. There is no second best. There is nothing even close that approaches the history, the different cultures of the two cities and the huge chasm between the unparalleled success on one side and the unmatched anguish and heartbreak on the other. And if New York and Boston aren’t big enough rivals just consider this; Their marathons occur approximately a week after baseball ends in the fall and a week after baseball resumes in the spring. The Yankees and Boston even fought it out last spring during the Boston Marathon in the annual Patriot’s Day game.

So why is this in a running blog?

Well for starters, there are probably no two activities different than going out for a run and following a baseball game. Running is relentless, inexorably moving forward, usually with a finite goal of either time or distance. Baseball, on the other hand, takes its sweet time delivering its story uncaring whether you need to be somewhere, or whether you should be asleep or whether things should be getting done. And for me the game isn’t enough. I have to hear the commentary and the fan reaction and see if I’m thinking the same way the experts are. And at work, everybody has an opinion and people take sides.
Some take it more seriously than others. Some don’t realize their lives won’t change no matter who wins. I’m happy to see that I finally have that awareness although it took a long time.

So why is this in a running blog?

Well for starters, the weather for most of the series was pretty awful for spectators sitting in those ancient open air stadiums-cool and clammy in the high 40’s to low 50’s . You saw them huddled in their winter clothes hoping they would eventually remember what their hands felt like.Beer and soda were disdained. Hot chocolate and coffee were hoarded just for hand warmers. By the end of a game a spectator could have spent enough money keeping warm and well fed to afford a pair of good running shoes. And all I kept thinking was could I please get weather like this for all my races especially my marathons.

Great! But why is this in a running blog?

When I figure that out, I’ll let you know but right now I’m too drained and going through withdrawal. It’s going to be five long months before the Yankees and Red Sox play again. Thankfully I’ll have running to sustain me through the baseball free winter.

Thursday, August 26, 2004

Rain cools off Contact Race

At a little after two pm on Saturday afternoon, August 21, 2004,the sky opened up in torrents of rain and heavy wind gusts just like the weather forecasters had been ominously predicting all week. The wind was so vicious that it picked up the volunteer tent and split it in two. But the weather soon improved, as the rain eventually stopped and the stifling humidity broke and the ninth annual Fanwood Contact We Care 5K
proceeded according to schedule.

“The bad weather actually happened at the best time ,” said race director Mark Zenobia of On Your Mark Productions (OYMP). “We had already set up and covered everything and it was better that the thunder and lightning didn’t happen around race time as they had predicted.”

“We’re pleased with the turnout ,” said Jeff Stirrat, director of Contact We Care. “We had over three hundred applicants again and might have done even better if the weather forecast had been better.”

The overall winner was 27-year-old Tirhazovin Khalid of Parsippany,NJ in a time of 16:11 , breaking a two-year streak of Scotch Plains Fanwood High School runners. The previous two winners Bob Wallden and defending champion Zack McGuire chose not to run.

Walter Biner, a 2003 Scotch Plains Fanwood High School(SPFHS) graduate was the first Scotch Plains finished, third overall in 16:41 improving on his ninth place finish a year ago.

“I have been training hard this summer on hills in Watchung Reservation so I felt ready for this course,” said Biner who will be running cross-country at the University of Massachusetts this fall. Biner’s high school coach and current Raider Cross Country coach Jeff Koegel was proud of his former pupil.

“Walter came to me at the beginning of the summer looking for help with his training, so I shared my philosophy on college-level summer training with him. He really dedicated himself to logging the type of miles you need to succeed at the 8K distance,” said Koegel.

“A lot of the miles that he ran were not easy miles, either. It's very easy, living in Scotch Plains or Fanwood, to stick to the flatlands, but he has spent a lot of time running on the other side of Route 22 on the hills.”

Although she did not repeat as women’s champion, Raider senior Mary Shashaty improved her 2003 time by 33 seconds, running 19:47, 13 seconds behind the overall women’s winner Kim Keenan-Kirkpatrick of Pittstown, NJ . Shashaty needed medical assistance after the race because of breathing difficulties but was pleased with her race.

“I think I’m ready for a good season. I ran very well today,” said Shashaty.

“Although we didn't discuss any expectations before the race, my goal was for Mary to run under 20:00, which is a big barrier for high school girls. She had only done so once before, at last year's Watchung Conference meet ,” said Koegel.

“I think she could have run faster had she not been suffering from an exercise-induced asthma attack during the race. I truly believe that she could have run about 20 seconds faster if her respiration had remained normal throughout the race .”

The top Fanwood finisher was junior Josh Zinman who lopped 56 seconds off his 2003 time with an 18:06, good for sixth overall and propelling Zinman to the top of the SPFHS
team.
“I’m sure this was a big confidence boost for him going into the fall having run nearly a minute faster than last year. I think he still can improve on that quite a bit. You have to remember that this was his first race since May 22, “ said Koegel.
.”His training has picked up over the past few weeks and it is starting to show now. He still needs to work on his form a good bit.”

Raider sophomore Allie Hoynes-O’Connor was top Fanwood finisher with a time of 21:09 “ I know she was disappointed that she didn't break 21:00, but I think she will just use that as motivation. I am hoping that Allie will get herself down to the low-20:00's this fall, “ said Koegel.

The most improved Raider runner was sophomore Adam Biner,Walter’s younger brother, who improved from 21:04 last year to 18:54 this year, 13th overall. “He seems to be picking up his effort in training, and he's obviously way ahead of where he was at this point last year. The key now is to get him used to being a varsity runner and dealing with the psychological pressures that accompany that ,” said Koegel.

The top family performance was by the Bencivengo family of Fanwood, where the father 49 year old David was able to outrun his twin thirteen year olds, Greg and Lana in times of 19:46, 20:28 and 22:00 respectively.

In addition to the main event over one hundred children between the ages of two and eleven participated in races from 25 to 200 yards and six wheelchair racers competed in a one-mile race.

“It was a great day ,” said Stirrat.
“We can hardly wait for the tenth annual race next year”.

Thursday, August 19, 2004

2004 Contact We Care Preview

The naysayers said that a Saturday evening race at the height of the summer vacation
would never work but the Fanwood Contact We Care 5K have been proving its doubters wrong for eight successful years.
and by late Saturday night there will be a ninth piece of evidence that a well run summer race that pleases its entrants will always draw a loyal following.

If past races are any indication, the race should draw over 300 runners to the 5K events
Saturday night. Under the direction of Mark Zenobia of On Your Mark Productions
(OYMP) and with the help of Frank Gousman and the dedicated volunteers from
Contact We Care the race has become a staple of the late summer running
schedule Debuting in 1996 with 288 runners, the race has drawn between 300 and
400 the past eight years.

“ It’s a solid, local family event...with a tough but fair course. It has good amenities and an eight year history ,”
said Zenobia.

Scotch Plains Raider distance runners both past and present have dominated the 5K the past two years.
Last year 2004 graduate Zack McGuire won the men’s race in 15:56 and senior Mary Shashaty captured the women’s
race in her first road race. The previous year 2002 graduate Bob Wallden out ran McGuire to win by
ten seconds. According to coach Jeff Koegel, who finished third here in 1997, the Raiders will be hard pressed to make this a three-peat.

“The only way it would be three in a row is if one of my alumni wins it, but I don't know if you're planning on counting
on that. No one currently on the team is going to win it- I'm more than a bit disappointed in most of their fitness levels right now, “ said Koegel.

Leading contenders among recent Scotch Plains alumni are Walter Biner and Michael Dixon who have had some strong performances in summer races. McGuire is not expected to enter this year and last years’ top runner Brian Kopnicki
will be preparing for an important time trial at his new school, the College of New Jersey.

Koegel’s women runners led by Shashaty have a better chance of winning the race for a second straight
year. “That's a possibility, but that all depends on who shows up, which you can never
determine in a road race the way you can in a conference or county XC race.
You never know if some area college girl will show up and use this race as a
tune-up before she goes back to school for training camp, or if one of the top
state-level runners will jump in,” said Koegel.

“I have no concern over her winning the race or not, just as I didn't last year
with her or with Zack. It was nice that she won the race, but neither of us
even spoke or thought of it before the race. The sole purpose of us coming and
running this race is to see what kind of fitness level we have at that point and
to see where we need to go with our training from there,” added Koegel.

Another rising Raider women’s star, sophomore Allie Hoynes-O’Connor should finish among the top women.
O’Connor missed last year’s race but was the top freshman distance runner last year and looks forward to running
the race.
“I live right along the course and have been watching this race from in front of my house for several years ,”
said Hoynes-O’Connor.

Fanwood resident Don Hessemer will be running the race for the ninth straight years. “I try to never miss this race,” said Hessemer. “It’s really great that a town like Fanwood can have such a good race.”

The festivities start at 5 pm with a kids sprint for ages 2-11. The races
increase in distance for each age group The main event goes off at 5:45 pm. The
men’s record was 15:25 by Amilcar Duarte in 1998 and the women’s by Jodie
Dariano , a 17:53 in 1998.

The course starts on Martine Ave and crosses LaGrande and South Avenues before
turning right on North Avenue. The one-mile mark is passed as the runners make
a hairpin left onto Midway. The runners go left on Martine and right on south
before crossing the railroad tracks over Sheelen’s Crossing. After going left
on South they run a short distances on 2nd before going right on
LaGrande,passing the finish line and the two-mile mark. They then head left on
Helen Street before making another left onto Coriell and another left on
Martine before turning left one more time back onto La Grande where the finish
line sits in front of the park.

“It is a fair,challenging course with four good upgrades”, said Koegel. After
the race will an invitational wheelchair race at 6:30.

The proceeds from the race benefit Contact We Care a 24 by 7 telephone
hotline serving residents of Union, Essex, Middlesex and Somerset Counties. It
trains and supervises volunteers who listen, understand and assist callers to
work through their problems. The hotline number, 908-232-2880, receives over
1,000 calls per month.

Tuesday, March 2, 2004

E Murray Todd

This race report was originally written in March 2004

Winter was broken with a vengeance this year. Unless we get one of those March
surprises it will appear that the worst winter storms actually happened in Autumn, the early December blizzard playing havoc with a number of late season races. January was brutally cold but not too stormy and February was snow free which is all that you can ask for. The rare 29th day superceded what would normally be March 1, which for runners is the true end of winter when the spring races start up in earnest.

It took me 20 years of racing but I finally experienced the E Murray Todd half marathon
which took advantage of the beautiful weather to double their entries with 250 post registrants almost unheard of for a half marathon. One would hope that these last minute sign ups were not sedentary the whole winter and decided to take advantage of the conditions for some needed exercise. If they did they are most certainly in a lot of pain for the next week.

This was not just any half marathon. My best description would be Midland terrain with four extra miles which doesn’t mean it’s a slow course but it will challenge the strength of your quadriceps. Although the race has been around over two decades and definitely has a hard corps of annual returnees(I saw many people wearing previous years’ shirts) it does not draw the USATF crowd because it doesn’t offer points and has frequently conflicted with the Newark 20K. It is run by the Monmouth County Parks commission and has some nice amenities like the use of the Brookdale Community College facilities which includes a large parking lot and gym and locker room facilities.

Seeing the amount of runners who seemed in near mid season form makes you realize that there really is no down time for running. Although I have run all winter and had no problem with the distance, I was not ready to run any kind of fast pace and my slow time showed it.
But there’s a lot racing time left this year and I can only hope that other races this year can have the weather that we had on the last day of February.

Sunday, February 15, 2004

The weight is over

As most of you know I was pretty exhilarated with my performance at the 2003

Philadelphia Marathon. I just can’t believe how far off my prediction was.

I am usually pretty accurate at predicting my race times, sometimes being so

close that if the prognostication was overly pessimistic I have been accused of

sandbagging or lowering expectations too much. I attribute my accuracy to a

three category approach I have always used to try and gauge my fitness before

an event.

I have always believed that to run your best a runner must have three things

going for them and each scales from 1 to 100 points:

The first is weight, which becomes more important as the distance lengthens. If

you think of a marathon as 50,000 steps then every extra pound you are carrying

is 50,000 pounds of stress on your legs. Weight is a personal thing based on

many factors including your bone density. What is a fit weight for one person

may not be so for another but I have gotten to know what my correct weight

ranges should be. Going into Philadelphia my weight was very worrisome. It had

been on an inexorable climb since September. I gave myself about a 30 or 35 (of

100) .

The second is leg strength which again is far more important as the distance

lengthens. The amount of hills whether up and down accentuates the need for leg

strength . While I was never sure exactly how long my long runs had been, they

were taking well over three hours and I felt better after each long run. I was

also doing significant weight training to strengthen my quads and hamstrings so

I give my leg strength about 85.

The final is aerobic capacity which is more important in the shorter races.

Aerobic capacity can be very helpful in predicting times because it enables you

to know what pace you are comfortable with. I had a good idea of what my

training run paces were and combined with mediocre race times gave me no more

than 40 or 50 rating.

There is a fourth variable that can be added and this is miscellaneous factors

that combine intangibles like attitude and race strategy with uncontrollables

like weather and health.

I think the miscellaneous factors again matter more when the race is longer.

One of my friends absolutely lives for colder running conditions which has

always been my preference.

So based on everything I knew, I had no reason to think I could go any faster

than 4:10 at best and I was starting to scale that back. My attitude was pretty

good and the weather was great which took some time off the predictor.

The secret of course, is to get everything working together at the same time

and find the perfect day and the perfect distance and you can then have your

perfect race. While Philly was far from a perfect race for me, the final time

was in comparison to my predicting indicators.

If I was 20 pounds lighter, with better aerobic capacity and similar leg

strength the miscellaneous factors would have to be pretty strongly negative

for me to not significantly beat this time. I hope I can test that one in my

next marathon.

Thursday, December 11, 2003

Slow USATF 10 mile

One last chance to show how slow I am. There are not a lot of reasons to go to
the USATF 10 mile championships. You get nothing for running the race-no goodie
bag or shirt-nada!. You are matched up against mostly very serious runners on a
three loop course where if you're as slow as me you actually get lapped by the
leaders. So why go? I kept asking the question.

As of about 9 am I wasn't positive I was going to run but I thought if I didn't
I would have no benchmark of where I was at the end of the year. The weather
was pretty good also, so I drove over.

This was a course that I knew real well having run close to 100 races there
mostly in the summer. I was hoping to break 82 minutes and figured I would try
and hold 7:45's to 7:50's as long as I could. I ran the first mile with Dean
Shonts and had a 7:46 but I couldn't hold it. Three miles was 24 minutes-5
miles was 41 and you get the idea.

I was slowing down and made a new goal of breaking 84. That became 85 minutes
as the leaders started lapping me between the sixth and seventh miles. The
winners did 52 minutes-my seventh mile was about 58 minutes. I was slowing to
just under nine minutes a mile and was running all alone. There were a few
runners slightly ahead of me and I almost caught one. I knew exactly how far I
had to go and actually ran the last mile pretty well. My finishing time of
84:25 was 17 minutes slower than I had run in 1996 and 5 minutes slower than
1997 where I had gotten hurt and walked almost a mile but I was still happy.

This was yet another case where a race time portended a slower marathon but in
the race that counted the most-I had a time at Philly I can be proud of for the
winter. Before I go to Florida on Wednesday I am planning on signing up for
Shore so I have a nice bullseye at the end of April to shoot for. Now,if I can
just start doing the Saturday ten miles a little closer to Sunday's time. My
legs are so sore today - I guess it was worth it.